So, I had a go at working it out. For the sake of argument, compare the average time people spend reading a blog with, say, the length of a TV Ad. This blogger reckons the average time spent reading their blog is five minutes.
The average TV ad is 30 secs. A factor of ten difference.
So, therefore, to get the same level of engagement via TV as you would via the average blog, you could argue that you need to reach ten times as many people.
So, for a blog that has 2000 readers, to get an equivalent level of engagement via TV you would need to get 20,000 people to see your ad.
So, could you say that if it costs £5,000 to reach 20,000 people via TV, then the AVE for the blog read by 2000 people would be £5,000?
I guess you could, but there are quite a few holes in the theory, to say the least.
Still, it's a theory.






